Evidence Hub

The postoperative analgesic efficacy of three peripheral nerve blocks in hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

Vermazen K, Niblett A, Thomson C, Tebbett A

Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026

1,059 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery is often supplemented with a peripheral nerve block (PNB) to reduce postoperative pain. Common PNBs include fascia-iliaca compartment block (FICB) and femoral nerve block (FNB). Since the introduction of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, debate continues as to which technique provides superior analgesia. This review aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of three PNBs when administered perioperatively to adult hip fracture patients.

Methods: CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, Medline, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched in April 2025. Statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects model.

Results: 19 randomised trials (1059 patients) were included. Pain scores between PENG and FICB at 6, 12 and 24 h were not significantly different. Compared to FNB, PENG significantly lowered pain scores at 6 h (P = 0.004). Opioid consumption in the 24 h postoperative period was significantly lower in PENG than FICB (P = 0.02), but not in FNB. No outcome reached the minimal clinically important difference. Evidence was graded very low to moderate.

Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence to state superiority of PENG over FICB or FNB when used perioperatively in patients undergoing hip fracture repair. No included studies reported time to mobilisation, highlighting a significant evidence gap in existing primary research. Further high-quality, sufficiently powered randomised trials are still…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,059 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free