Evidence Hub

OP0019 HPR a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing gastrointestinal, liver, renal and cardiovascular adverse events of paracetamol

J. Kaur, B. Kundaki, G. Nakafero, A. Abhishek, M. Doherty, Wei-Ya Zhang

Oral Presentations, 2019

2,262,517 participants

Abstract

Background Despite its modest efficacy, guidelines consistently recommend paracetamol as a first-line analgesic for osteoarthritis (OA) based on its perceived safety. However, there is growing controversy, highlighted in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence OA (NICE) 2014 guidance on OA, that paracetamol is not as safe as previously thought, especially at the highest therapeutic dose of 4gm/day. Objectives To investigate the association between paracetamol and gastrointestinal, liver, renal and cardiovascular adverse events both in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Methods We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED, AHMED, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for published literature in any language to the end of November 2018 for (1) RCTs of paracetamol in symptomatic OA, and (2) observational studies irrespective of any underlying condition, to determine the risk of gastrointestinal, liver, renal and cardiovascular adverse events. We included studies assessing oral paracetamol in people aged ≥18 years and reporting on clinically relevant adverse effects. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated for RCT and cohort studies, whereas odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI were used for case-control studies. Results were pooled as appropriate using random effects model. The risk of bias was assessed using modified Cochrane tool for RCTS and Newcastle Ottawa scale for observational studies. Results We…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,262,517 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free