Evidence Hub

Effectiveness and safety of interventions for fever-associated discomfort in children: A systematic review

Corsello A, Alberti I, Farhanghi S, Bonetti A, Garattini S, Comotti A, Marchisio P, Chiappini E et al.

British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025

1,877 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

AIMS: Fever is one of the most frequent reasons for paediatric consultations. While traditionally managed by reducing body temperature, recent guidelines emphasize alleviating discomfort as the primary therapeutic goal. Although different interventions have been described to manage fever-associated discomfort in children, their effectiveness and safety has never been systematically analysed. The aim of this study was to review the evidence on the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for managing discomfort in febrile children.

METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420250655721). PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched up to 31 January 2025, for studies involving children aged 29 days to 18 years that assessed interventions for fever-associated discomfort. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies were included. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane and STROBE tools. Results were synthesized narratively and grouped according to the type of intervention.

RESULTS: Eight studies (5 randomized controlled trials, 3 observational) involving 1877 children were included. Study designs, including dosage of antipyretics and quality varied across studies. Studies comparing ibuprofen and paracetamol provided conflicting results, while combination therapy (paracetamol + ibuprofen) appeared more effective than using a single drug in -one trial. Tepid sponging, despite…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,877 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free