Evidence Hub

The effect of Kinesio taping on postoperative complications following mandibular third molar surgery/extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abu-Zaid A, Aldoseri YT, Alenezi ATA, Dashti HAM, Aldhafairi LF, Oqlah MDH, Alkandari MI, Aldulaimi AM et al.

Frontiers in dental medicine, 2025

721 participants

Abstract

Background/objectives: The surgical removal of mandibular third molars is frequently followed by pain, swelling, and trismus. Conventional management relies on analgesics, anti-inflammatory drugs, and corticosteroids, but interest in non-pharmacological adjuncts persists. Kinesio taping (KT) has been explored in randomized trials as a potential aid in reducing postoperative morbidity. This review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of KT after mandibular third molar surgery.

Methods: Five databases were searched until September 2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing KT with standard care, no taping, or sham taping after mandibular third molar extraction, reporting pain, swelling, or maximum interincisal opening (MIO). Data were extracted independently and pooled as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals using random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool.

Results: In total, 16 RCTs, involving 721 participants, were included. KT significantly reduced pain on day 1 (MD = -1.25, p p = 0.04), and day 7 (MD = -1.08, p = 0.01), though not on day 2. Swelling reduction was significant on day 2 (MD = -2.45 cm, p p p = 0.02), and 7 (MD = 2.41 mm, p = 0.04).

Conclusion: KT appears to provide short-term benefits in pain control, swelling reduction, and mouth opening after third molar surgery. While promising, effect sizes vary, and heterogeneity underscores the need for larger, standardized RCTs…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 721 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free