Evidence Hub

Quality Indicators for the Pharmacological Management of Chronic Non-Cancer Pain in Older Adult Patients: An Integrative Review

Goetschi AN, Verloo H, Schönenberger N, Wernli U, Meyer-Massetti C

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

Rationale: Chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) affects 28%-88% of older adults. They also experience more medication-related problems and are more likely to receive insufficient pain therapy, impacting their quality of care. Quality indicators (QIs) can be used to assess and improve the quality of their care.

Aims and objectives: This integrative review aimed to consolidate the scientific evidence on existing QIs for the pharmacological care of older adult patients with CNCP.

Methods: We systematically searched Medline and Embase via Ovid, CINAHL via EBSCO, the SCOPUS databases and Google Scholar. We used backward citation searching to identify additional studies. We included studies reporting validated QIs and studies reporting quality-related factors associated with reduced medication safety caused by pain-related medication therapy. Two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts and full texts. One extracted and charted the data and assessed the risk of bias; the second validated this.

Results: We screened 4068 articles identified through the systematic search of databases and 2774 articles identified via citation searching. Seventy-eight articles met our inclusion criteria and were retained for analysis. We extracted 11 validated QIs and developed a further 243 based on quality criteria reported in the literature. QIs covered different levels, from pharmacotherapy in general to particular substance groups and individual active substances. The risk of bias in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free