Access, barriers and health outcomes of abortion and postabortion care in humanitarian and fragile settings in Africa: a systematic review
Abstract
Objectives: To assess access, barriers and health outcomes of abortion and postabortion care in humanitarian and fragile settings across Africa.
Design: Systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.
Data source: Scopus, PubMed, Epistemonikos, along with websites like Google and Google Scholar were searched through 15 February 2025.
Eligibility criteria: Studies conducted in African humanitarian settings that focus on abortion, postabortion care and abortion-related complications were included, regardless of study design or language.
Data extraction and synthesis: Before commencing actual data extraction, a prior data extraction template was developed by reviewers through using a sample of two included articles. The thematic content analysis was conducted using MAXQDA software, guided by the socioecological model.
Results: Humanitarian conditions increased unintended pregnancies and demand for abortion services while health system disruptions limited access to safe care. Women were frequently resorting to unsafe abortion methods using traditional substances, detergents or harmful objects because of legal restrictions, stigma and limited access to family planning. Delays in abortion care are often driven by distance, cost, lack of confidentiality and fear of legal consequences. Cultural influences and cost concerns also led women to delay seeking healthcare, resulting in complications. Common challenges across many…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Effect of dexamethasone as an analgesic adjuvant to multimodal pain treatment after total knee arthroplasty: randomised clinical trial
- Effect of a Postoperative Multimodal Opioid-Sparing Protocol vs Standard Opioid Prescribing on Postoperative Opioid Consumption After Knee or Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- Comparison of the Post-Caesarean Analgesic Effect of Adding Dexmedetomidine to Paracetamol and Ketorolac: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- A triple-blind randomized clinical trial of different associations between dexamethasone and non-steroids anti-inflammatories for preemptive action in third molar extractions
- An open label randomized clinical trial of Indomethacin for mild and moderate hospitalised Covid-19 patients
- Oral paracetamol and/or ibuprofen for treating pain after soft tissue injuries: Single centre double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.