Evidence Hub

Impact of combined oral contraceptives and progestin-only pills on psychological and sexual well-being of women with endometriosis: A systematic review

Salmeri N, Piccini M, Caprara F, Somigliana E, Viganò P, Vercellini P

Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Introduction: Women with endometriosis frequently experience psychological and sexual concerns. Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and progestin-only pills (POPs) represent first-line treatments for the disease, yet their potential negative impact on mood and sexuality remains debated.

Material and methods: We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus up to August 1st, 2025, to assess whether COCs or POPs adversely affect psychological well-being or sexual function in this population. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies comparing COCs or POPs with no treatment in women with endometriosis. Outcomes of interest were adverse event rates and patient-reported measures of mood and sexual health. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 and ROBINS-I. Given heterogeneity in outcome measures, we applied vote counting by direction of effect and harvest plots, with confidence intervals (CIs) calculated using the Wilson method, in line with Cochrane guidance. The study protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD420250656420).

Results: Of 1424 records screened, seven studies (four RCTs, three observational) met the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was low in RCTs and moderate-to-serious in observational studies. Six of seven (pooled proportion: 86%; 95% CI: 49%-97%) reported no increased risk of psychological dysfunction in users. None reported increased sexual dysfunction (100%; 95% CI: 65%-100%). Most…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free