Evidence Hub

Choice of antipyretic in children

Khubchandani RP, Ghatikar KN, Keny S, Usgaonkar NG

The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 1995

29 participants

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relative efficacy of 3 commonly used antipyretics viz. mefenamic acid, ibuprofen and paracetamol. The subjects were randomized to 3 groups to receive either paracetamol 10 mg/kg or ibuprofen 7 mg/kg or mefenamic acid 6.5 mg/kg. Axilla temperature was recorded just prior to drug administration and at hourly intervals for 4 hrs. The mefenamic acid group (n = 29) showed a drop of 3.5 degrees F at the end of 4 hours as compared to the paracetamol group (n = 29) (drop 2.44 degrees F) and ibuprofen group (n = 20) (drop 2.79 degrees F). Analysis of the area under the mean temperature vs. time curve showed that mefenamic acid demonstrated significantly better antipyretic activity compared to paracetamol (P < 0.05) over the entire period of observation and ibuprofen (P < 0.05) in the 2 to 4 hour range. Mefenamic acid continued to show antipyretic activity at the end of 4 hours in contrast to ibuprofen and paracetamol. Since the period of observation was restricted to 4 hours, we were unable to quantify the precise duration of its extended antipyretic efficacy.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 29 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free