Evidence Hub

Dipyrone versus paracetamol: a double-blind study in typhoid fever

Ajgaonkar VS, Marathe SN, Virani AR

The Journal of international medical research, 1988

25 participants

Abstract

In a double-blind study in patients with typhoid fever 25 patients received 500 mg dipyrone and 28 received 500 mg paracetamol. Rectal temperature and pulse records were monitored every 30 min. The onset of anti-pyresis in patients given dipyrone (30 min) was significantly different from those given paracetamol (1 h). The area under the time-temperature curves was significantly greater for patients given dipyrone. The sum of the reduction in temperature at all times significantly favoured patients who had been given dipyrone. Both treatments were well tolerated.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 25 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free