Evidence Hub

Bioavailability and pharmacokinetic profile of a newly-developed twice-a-day sustained-release paracetamol formulation

Liu DJ, Collaku A, Youngberg SP

International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2015

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A new twice daily sustained-release (SR) paracetamol formulation was developed to improve convenience and enhance patient compliance for treatment of pain from chronic diseases. This research aimed to evaluate bioavailability and compare pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of the new SR paracetamol formulation (2x1,000 mg) with those of immediate-release (IR) paracetamol (2x500 mg) and existing extended-release (ER) paracetamol (2x665 mg).

METHODS: Two randomized, single-dose, 4-way crossover studies were conducted. A total of 28 healthy male and female volunteers participated in each study. The relative bioavailability, partial extent of absorption, overall elimination, food effect, and safety were evaluated.

RESULTS: The estimates of relative bioavailability of new SR with IR formulation based on dose-adjusted AUC0-inf were 91% (0.86-0.96) for the fasted state and 99% (0.95-1.02) for the fed state, while these estimates comparing new SR with ER formulation were 99% (0.96-1.03) in the fasted state and 98% (0.95-1.02) in the fed state. The accumulated mean time period at or above the minimal therapeutic plasma paracetamol concentration for the new SR was from 90% to 112% longer than that of the IR formulation, in fasted and fed state, respectively. Food significantly increased Cmax of SR formulation, with ratios fast vs. fed 0.79 (p<0.0001) and 0.77 (p<0.0001) in study I and II, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: The new SR formulation was well absorbed, with more than 90%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free