Evidence Hub

Paracetamol prior to catheter balloon insertion for labor induction - A randomized controlled trial: paracetamol prior to catheter-balloon insertion for labor induction

Frank Wolf M, Sgayer I, Abu Shqara R, Naskovica K, Kassis F, Kushnir N, Lavinsky M, Idilbi N et al.

American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM, 2025

71 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessing maternal pain and satisfaction following administration of paracetamol vs. placebo prior to catheter balloon placement.

METHODS: Primiparous women at term admitted for medically-indicated labor induction were randomized to receive intravenous paracetamol 1 gram in 100cc normal saline (N=71) or placebo of 100cc normal saline (N=70) prior to catheter balloon insertion. The women were blinded to the intervention allocation. Primary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS) scores and maternal satisfaction, assessed via questionnaire.

RESULTS: Pre-induction maternal pain did not differ between the paracetamol and placebo groups. Median VAS scores at 2, 30, and 60 minutes after catheter insertion were comparable between the groups: 6.46±2.77 vs. 6.66±2.78, P=.68; 5.53±3.20 vs. 5.93±3.01, P=.46; and 5.83±3.25 vs. 6.49±2.88, P=.26, respectively. For the paracetamol vs. placebo group, the mean sum of VAS scores was lower (4.39 vs. 5.37, P=.045) and the proportion with a mean VAS score <5 was higher (65.2% vs. 44.1%, P=.016). This difference persisted in a multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for maternal age (OR=2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.5, P=.036). After balloon insertion, relatively fewer women in the paracetamol vs. placebo group showed immobility (33.8% vs 50.0%, P=.037) and needed analgesics (31.3% vs. 66.1%, P<.001). Maternal satisfaction score was similar between the groups (P=.877). Cervical ripening, duration from catheter insertion to delivery,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 71 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free