Evidence Hub

Prediction model for metformin intolerance in Chinese elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: derivation and external validation in a cross‑sectional study

W. Tan, Yi-Zhe Li, Binhui Lu, Jing Zhang, Yuxin Huang

BMC Endocrine Disorders, 2026

538 participants

Abstract

Approximately 30% of patients taking metformin experience gastrointestinal adverse events, with 5%–10% discontinuing the drug due to intolerance. The aim of our study is to develop and externally validate a prediction model for metformin intolerance in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. This study utilized data from three independent cohorts of Chinese elderly metformin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes. The derivation cohort consisted of 538 patients. External validation was performed using data from a separate cohort of 319 patients. Intolerance was assessed after patients initiated metformin and maintained treatment for over four weeks. Patients who were unable to complete at least four weeks of treatment due to gastrointestinal adverse effects were also classified as intolerance. In the derivation cohort, the median age was 67 years, median HbA1c was 8.1%, and 45% were female. The external validation cohort had a median age of 70 years, median HbA1c of 7.6%, and 54.5% were female. Metformin intolerance occurred in 75 patients (13.9%) in the derivation cohort and 63 patients (19.7%) in the external validation cohort. Multivariable analysis identified ten variables: gender, age, body mass index, fasting glucose, HbA1c, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, antidepressants, proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel. In the derivation cohort, the model demonstrated an AUC of 0.889, with a sensitivity of 0.813 and a specificity of 0.773. Upon external…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 538 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free