Evidence Hub

A phase I/II randomized controlled clinical trial to assess the feasibility, safety, and preliminary effectiveness of paracetamol in resolving acute kidney injury in children with severe malaria

Paasi G, Namayanja C, Ongodia P, Okalebo CB, Okiror W, Abongo G, Masifa G, Amorut D et al.

Trials, 2026

40 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is prevalent among children with severe malaria, contributing to considerable morbidity and mortality. Oxidative stress has been implicated in the pathophysiology of malaria-induced AKI, and paracetamol, with its antioxidant properties, has been proposed as a solution. This phase I/II randomized trial evaluated paracetamol as a potential renoprotective adjunct in children with severe malaria and acute kidney injury.

METHODS: We conducted a phase I/II open label parallel randomized controlled trial of 40 hospitalized children aged > 6 months to < 12 years with malaria-induced AKI in eastern Uganda. Participants were randomized by a sealed envelope 1:1 to receive either oral paracetamol 20 mg/kg 6 hourly for 48 h or tepid sponging every 30 min until fever subsided. Only the assessors of the primary outcome were masked to the intervention. The primary outcome was renal recovery at 48 h assessed using restricted mean survival time (RMST) in intention to treat population of children according to their randomization groups.

RESULTS: Between 19 September 2021 and 25 August 2023, 250 children with hemoglobinuric severe malaria were screened and the 40 enrolled were randomly assigned paracetamol (n = 20) or tepid sponging (n = 20). The mean age was 6.54 (2.61) years. The mean time to renal recovery in the paracetamol group was 0.491 h (95% CI, -9.265 to 10.248; p = 0.921) longer than the control group within 48 h, but this difference was not…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 40 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free