Evidence Hub

Intestinal absorption in patients after cardiac surgery

Berger MM, Berger-Gryllaki M, Wiesel PH, Revelly JP, Hurni M, Cayeux C, Tappy L, Chioléro R

Critical care medicine, 2000

23 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We designed this study to assess intestinal absorption in patients with adequate or altered hemodynamic status after cardiac surgery and to test clinical tolerance to early enteral nutrition.

DESIGN: Prospective, descriptive study.

SETTING: Surgical intensive unit in a university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS: Cardiac surgery patients, age 64+/-10 yrs (mean +/-SD) were subdivided into two groups according to hemodynamic status: group I, 16 patients with adequate hemodynamic status; group II, 23 patients with hemodynamic failure. These groups were compared with healthy controls (group III, n = 6).

INTERVENTIONS: Paracetamol pharmacokinetic study on days 1 and 3 with nasogastric or postpyloric paracetamol administration. Early postpyloric or conventional gastric nutrition in group II.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Plasma concentrations were measured on days 1 and 3, and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Absorption was strongly reduced on day 1 in all patients after gastric administration (lower peak paracetamol and AUC), but normal after postpyloric delivery. Duration of anesthesia and of circulatory bypass did not affect paracetamol absorption. On day 3, AUC was close to normal in case of hemodynamic failure. Peak absorption on day 1 was negatively correlated with opiate dose (r2 = 0.176, p = .008). Hypocaloric enteral nutrition was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS: The close-to-normal AUC, during low cardiac output, despite lower peak paracetamol, shows…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 23 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free