Evidence Hub

Intramasseteric versus pterygomandibular space dexamethasone injection for oedema and trismus after mandibular third molar surgery: a randomised split-mouth clinical trial

Pektaş MY, Topal O

BMC oral health, 2026

20 participants

Abstract

Background: This study compared intramasseteric versus pterygomandibular space dexamethasone injection for postoperative oedema and trismus after mandibular third molar surgery.

Methods: This prospective, randomised, participant- and outcome assessor-blinded, active-comparator split-mouth clinical trial with sequential interventions was conducted at Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University between April 28, 2023 and April 27, 2024. Twenty adults aged 18-25 years, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I and requiring bilateral surgical extraction of comparable mandibular third molars, were enrolled. The two interventions were performed in randomised order at a three-week interval.

Results: All 20 participants completed both interventions. Operative time did not differ between injection sites (18.1 ± 2.8 vs. 18.1 ± 2.9 min; p = 1.000). Change in oedema was lower in the intramasseteric group on days 2 (4 [1-8] vs. 6 [4-12]; p < 0.001; difference between site-specific medians favouring intramasseteric injection, 2.0 mm) and 7 (0.5 [0-1] vs. 1 [0-3]; p = 0.006; difference between medians, 0.5 mm). Trismus was less severe on days 2 (10.4 ± 2.7 vs. 13.1 ± 3.2 mm; p = 0.006; mean difference, 2.7 mm; 95% CI, 0.9 to 4.5) and 7 (0.7 ± 0.8 vs. 1.2 ± 1.2 mm; p = 0.006; mean difference, 0.5 mm; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.8). Between-group pain, salivary cortisol level, Oral Health Impact Profile-14 score, and analgesic consumption differences were nonsignificant.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free