Evidence Hub

Comparison of caudal and retrolaminar blocks for postoperative analgesia in pediatric orchidopexy: a randomized controlled trial

Özen V, Umutoğlu T, Turan EI, Ayas TA, Yiğit D, Çiftçi B, Alver S

Minerva anestesiologica, 2026

Abstract

Background: Lower abdominal surgeries in children are associated with significant postoperative pain. While caudal block (CB) is widely used, ultrasound-guided truncal blocks such as retrolaminar block (RLB) may provide more targeted and prolonged analgesia.

Methods: In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted at two tertiary hospitals (March 1-September 1, 2025), children aged 1-7 years (ASA I-II) scheduled for unilateral orchidopexy were randomized to RLB or CB. CB received 0.125% bupivacaine 1 mL/kg (max 20 mL); RLB received 0.25% bupivacaine 0.1 mL/kg, both under standardized general anesthesia with intraoperative IV paracetamol (10 mg/kg). FLACC scores were recorded at 30 min and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h. Rescue analgesia was IV paracetamol for FLACC 2-4 and IV tramadol for FLACC >4. Primary outcome was analgesic efficacy (FLACC at 12th hour). Secondary outcomes were time to first analgesic and total consumption within 24 h.

Results: Sixty-two patients were analyzed (N.=31 per group); baseline demographics did not differ. RLB yielded lower FLACC scores at 6 h (P=0.002), 12 h (P=0.007), and 24 h (P=0.018), with no difference at 30 min or 1 h (P>0.05). Time to first analgesic was longer with RLB (P<0.001), and total 24-h consumption was lower (P=0.001). Fewer patients required rescue analgesia with RLB (3/31) than CB (14/31). No major block-related complications occurred.

Conclusions: In pediatric orchidopexy, RLB provided superior and more durable…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free