Evidence Hub

Comparison of the efficacy of Dexmedetomidine versus Ketamine as an adjunct to Ropivacaine for Scalp nerve block during Awake craniotomy surgery- A Randomised Controlled Trial : Dexmedetomidine versus Ketamine as adjuvants to Scalp nerve block

Faiz MM, Reddy A, Luthra A, Chauhan R, Meena SC, Sahoo S

BMC anesthesiology, 2026

23 participants

Abstract

Background: Scalp nerve block (SNB) is an established technique for effective analgesia during awake craniotomy, but its analgesic duration is limited when local anesthetics are used alone. Adjuvants such as dexmedetomidine and ketamine may enhance block efficacy, though direct comparative evidence remains limited.

Methods: This prospective trial randomized forty-six adult patients undergoing elective awake craniotomy to receive SNB with 0.5% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg (Group RD, n = 23) or ketamine 0.5 mg/kg (Group RK, n = 23). The primary outcome was the time to request the first rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes included onset of sensory blockade, postoperative pain scores, rescue analgesic consumption, hemodynamic variables, respiratory depression, psychosis, and time to discharge from the postoperative ward.

Results: The time to first rescue analgesia was significantly longer in Group RK compared with Group RD (18.67 [17.08-19.00] vs. 14.67 [12.92-15.08] hours; P = 0.001). Group RK demonstrated significantly lower postoperative pain scores at 6,10, and 16 h postoperatively (P < 0.004) and reduced consumption of rescue analgesia (P < 0.001). The onset of sensory blockade was comparable with a higher incidence of respiratory depression in Group RD (P = 0.02). Group RK showed higher intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure, though values remained within clinically acceptable limits.

Conclusion: Ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) as an adjuvant to ropivacaine…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 23 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free