Evidence Hub

Oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block versus transmuscular quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia and quality of recovery in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a prospective randomized controlled double-blind trial

Cebeci K, Akesen S, Cansabuncu S, Gurbet A, Uncu G

BMC anesthesiology, 2026

73 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During laparoscopic gynecological surgeries, trocar incisions, pneumoperitoneum and distention of the anterior abdominal wall can cause postoperative pain. Inadequate pain management can increase the risk of postoperative complications. The present study compared the effects of oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane (OSTAP) block and transmuscular quadratus lumborum (TQL) block on postoperative analgesia and quality of recovery (QoR) in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery. METHODS: A total of 73 patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. The patients were randomly allocated to the OSTAP group (n = 36) or the TQL group (n = 37). General anesthesia was induced following bilateral block administration with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. The primary outcome was postoperative tramadol requirement. Secondary outcomes included postoperative paracetamol requirement, time to first paracetamol and tramadol requirement, total paracetamol and tramadol consumption, visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest and during movement, and Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores preoperatively and 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Postoperative tramadol requirement was significantly lower in the TQL group (p = 0.006). Total paracetamol consumption was also significantly lower in the TQL group (p = 0.002). No significant between-group difference was observed in VAS scores at rest, whereas VAS scores during movement were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 73 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free