Evidence Hub

Pre-Emptive Initiation of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients With Acute Liver Failure With Cerebral Edema Improves Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Maiwall R, Bajpai M, Pasupuleti SSR, Chauhan N, Prajapati M, Prasad M, Agarwal P, Mathur RP et al.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Background and aim: An early initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for ammonia reduction has shown a reduction in deaths due to cerebral edema (CE) in acute liver failure (ALF); however, there are no controlled trials assessing the same.

Methods: We performed an open-label pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) on ALF patients with CE. Patients underwent therapeutic plasma-exchange (PLEX) by centrifugal apheresis after initial resuscitation. Group 1 received CRRT initiation within the first 12 h, while Group 2, CRRT was initiated for PLEX non-responders. The primary endpoint was 28-day survival.

Results: Patients aged 28.11 ± 10.10 years, 56.67% viral, 69% hyperacute were randomized. At day 28, 46% died and 11% underwent liver transplant. There were a total of 31 protocol violations, significantly more in group 2 (55.6% vs. 13.3%; p < 0.001). On ITT and piece-wise exponential regression analysis, pre-emptive CRRT was associated with a significantly lower hazard of death during the first 7 days (2.2% vs. 17.8% Hazard ratio [HR] 0.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.96) with comparable survival at 28-days. Notably, higher 28-day mortality was observed on PP analysis in group 2 (80% vs. 46%, HR 3.10, 95% CI 1.57-6.12) with a significantly higher reduction in ammonia and improvement in mean arterial pressure and lower number of sessions of TPE. Each hour delay in CRRT was associated with increased mortality (HR 1.01, 1.00-1.02).

Conclusion: A pre-emptive…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free