Evidence Hub

Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerves Block Through the Perichondrial Approach vs Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Recovery After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial

Kaciroglu A, Cevikkalp E, Ekinci M, Dikici M, Balcin O, Yildiz Eglen M, Nurdan Şen P, Efe EM et al.

Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026

30 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study compared the effects of ultrasound-guided modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through the perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) and subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block on postoperative recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty patients aged 18-65 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were included. At the end of surgery, patients were randomly assigned to receive either ultrasound-guided subcostal TAP block (group T, n=30) or M-TAPA block (group M, n=30), with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine administered on each side. Primary outcome was postoperative recovery at 24 hours (Quality of Recovery-15 [QoR-15] questionnaire). Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores (numerical rating scale [NRS]) at 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours, rescue analgesic requirements, and postoperative adverse effects. RESULTS The groups were comparable in age, height, weight, duration of surgery, and anesthesia-related variables (all P>0.05). Twenty-four-hour QoR-15 scores were similar between groups (P>0.05). Likewise, NRS pain scores did not differ significantly between groups (P>0.05). Significantly fewer patients required rescue analgesia in group M than in group T (30.0% vs 60.0%, P=0.020). Total rescue analgesic dose did not differ between groups (P=0.943). Postoperative adverse effects were comparable (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 30 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free