Evidence Hub

Effect of a phthalocyanine mouthrinse after connective tissue graft surgery for root coverage: a randomized split-mouth clinical trial

Cavallieri RS, Santos CA, Salbego RS, Damante CA, Santana ACP, Honório HM, Bonjardim LR, Ragghianti Zangrando MS

Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2026

20 participants

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate effects of self-activating phthalocyanine mouthrinse on recipient sites of subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG), considering clinical outcomes, professional and patient assessments and quantitative somatosensory changes.

Materials and methods: This randomized controlled, crossover, split-mouth clinical trial included 20 patients treated with SCTG plus coronally advanced flap (CAF). Recipient sites received 0.12% iron phthalocyanine mouthrinse (test group-PHY) and 0.12% chlorhexidine (control group-CHX) during 14 postoperative days. The primary outcome was percentage of root coverage (%RC) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included clinical parameters (probing depth, PD; recession depth and width, RD, RW; percentage of complete root coverage (CRC); clinical attachment level, CAL; keratinized tissue thickness and width, KTT, KTW), professional- and patient-reported outcomes, mechanical detection threshold (MDT) and mechanical pain threshold (MPT).

Results: PHY and CHX groups showed significant improvements in clinical parameters, including reduced RD and RW, CAL gain, and increased KTW and KTT (p < 0.05). %RC was similar between groups, at approximately 80%. Professional- and patient-reported outcomes, including dentin hypersensitivity and esthetic perception, as well as MPT and MDT, showed no significant differences between groups. Postoperative symptoms decreased progressively, and oral health-related quality of life remained unchanged after 6…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free