Evidence Hub

Long-term home-based physical exercise, pain, and use of pain medication over a year after hip fracture - A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial

Suikkanen S, Soukkio P, Kantola M, Kautiainen H, Haanpää M, Hupli MT, Kukkonen-Harjula K

Clinical rehabilitation, 2026

121 participants

Abstract

ObjectiveTo study the effects of a year-long, supervised home-based exercise training on perceived pain, pain interference, and use of pain medication over 12 months after hip fracture.DesignRandomised clinical trial, secondary analysisSettingHomeParticipantsParticipants (n = 121) had surgical repair of a hip fracture, were ≥60 years old, and community-living.InterventionParticipants were allocated into 12-month home-based Physical Exercise (n = 61) or Usual Care (n = 60). Exercise sessions (60 minutes/twice a week) at participants' home under physiotherapist supervision including strength, balance, and functional exercises.Main measuresPain intensity, interference, and locations, and information of the pain medication were queried at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months.ResultsThe mean age was 81 (SD 7) years, 91 (75%) were women, and 74 (61%) had fractured femoral neck. At baseline, in Physical Exercise 46 (75%) and in Usual Care 43 (72%) reported some sort of pain. After discharge, 118 (98%) used pain medication: 116 (96%) paracetamol and 41 (34%) opioids. At 12 months, there was no difference between groups in global pain prevalence, or in pain intensity, but the prevalence of hip pain (P = .047, effect size -0.38 (95% CI -0.51 to -0.22)) and pain interference (P = .042, effect size -0.18 (95% CI -0.52 to -0.05)) were lower in Physical Exercise than in Usual Care. At 12 months, there was no difference in medication use between the groups.ConclusionThe year-long supervised…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 121 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free