Evidence Hub

Soft-Tissue Augmentation During Implant Placement in the Aesthetic Zone: Clinical, Radiographic, Histological and Patient-Reported Outcomes From a Randomised Controlled Trial Using Connective Tissue Graft and a Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix

Papantonatou L, Batas L, Delantoni A, Anagnostou E, Vouros I

Journal of clinical periodontology, 2026

25 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the clinical, radiographic, histological and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of soft-tissue augmentation (STA) during implant placement in the aesthetic zone using a connective tissue graft (CTG) or a volume-stable collagen matrix (VCMX).

Materials and methods: In this three-arm randomised controlled trial, 25 patients were allocated to VCMX, SCTG, or no augmentation (control). Soft-tissue thickness (STT) was assessed by ultrasonography, and buccal bone thickness (BBT) by CBCT, at baseline and 6 months. Clinical parameters, PROMs and histological findings were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed at the patient level using repeated-measures general linear models, accounting for within-subject variability.

Results: Both VCMX and SCTG resulted in significant increases in STT compared with control (p < 0.001). Numerically greater STT gains were observed in the VCMX group. BBT decreased significantly over time in all groups, with no significant differences between treatments. PROMs were comparable, although CTG was associated with slightly higher morbidity. Histological analysis showed favourable integration of both grafting materials.

Conclusion: STA significantly increased STT but did not prevent buccal bone remodelling. Within the study limitations, both augmentation approaches were associated with increased STT compared with no augmentation. Further well-designed studies are required to confirm these findings.

Trial registration: This study…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 25 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free