Evidence Hub

Efficacy of Er:YAG laser in removal of impacted mandibular third molars (a randomized controlled clinical trial)

Elhaw KA, Abdelhakim AA, Dominguez J A, Eldibany RM, Tost A E

BMC oral health, 2026

24 participants

Abstract

Background: Removal of impacted mandibular third molars is associated with postoperative discomfort and delayed bone healing. Er:YAG laser osteotomy has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to conventional rotary instrumentation.

Aim: To compare Er:YAG laser osteotomy and conventional rotary osteotomy regarding postoperative radiographic bone density and clinical healing outcomes following impacted mandibular third molar removal (pain, edema, and trismus).

Methods: Twenty-four patients (n = 24) were randomized equally (laser n = 12; rotary n = 12). CBCT scans were obtained preoperatively and at 3 months for voxel-based grayscale bone density assessment. Standardized 3D ellipsoid VOIs were used. A single trained examiner performed all CBCT measurements twice, two weeks apart (ICC > 0.90). Postoperative pain, edema, and trismus were clinically assessed.

Results: Immediate postoperative bone density showed no significant difference between groups (p = 0.319). At 3 months, bone density was significantly higher in the laser group compared with the rotary group (median: 310.7 vs. 270.0; p = 0.017), with a moderate effect size (r = 0.477). Bone density significantly increased over time in both groups (p = 0.002), with a significantly greater increase observed in the laser group (p = 0.017). Pain scores on day 2 were significantly lower in the laser group (p = 0.020). Edema and trismus showed significant improvement over time within both groups, with no statistically…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 24 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free