Evidence Hub

Plication of fascia transversalis in comparison to no plication to reduce seroma formation post laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for direct inguinal hernia : a randomized controlled trial

Nageeb ME, Nashed GA, Asal AAA, Torfa KM

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026

146 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Purposes: Seroma is a frequent complication after laparoscopic hernias repair. Many techniques have been proposed to mitigate this issue, yet no approach has been standardized. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of transversalis fascia plication to reduce this.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at University Hospital from Jule 2024 to October 2025 after approval by the research ethics committee (MS-142-2024), involving adult patients who underwent TAPP repair for direct inguinal hernia. Exclusion criteria were indirect/pantaloon or recurrent hernias, conversion to open surgery, and concurrent procedures. Patients were randomized into two groups by ratio1:1 using computer-generated random sequence with opaque sealed envelopes opened only intraoperative after confirmation of direct hernia: Group A: underwent plication of the fascia transversalis, while the other did not. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative seroma. Secondary outcomes included postoperative recovery parameters and the complications. Secondary outcomes included postoperative recovery parameters and the complications.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27.

Results: 146 patients met the inclusion criteria. Demographic characteristics, preoperative comorbidities and hernia size were similar across both groups. At day 30 follow-up, 9 patients (12.3%) in the control group developed clinically detectable seromas, whereas none were in the plication…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 146 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free