Evidence Hub

Comparison of femoral triangle plus iPACK blocks with femoral triangle block alone for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled clinical trial on postoperative pain and knee function

Ferré F, Boussaguet L, Vari N, Pillard F, Bosch L, Ferrier A, Ba C, Tissot B et al.

Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026

45 participants

Abstract

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can cause severe postoperative pain. However, consensus regarding the most effective regional analgesia is lacking. We hypothesized that, compared with femoral triangle block (FTB) and local infiltration analgesia, adding an iPACK block would decrease postoperative morphine consumption.

Methods: Patients scheduled for ACLR under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to the FTB (n=45) or the FTB+iPACK group (n=45). The primary outcome was the cumulative oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption during the first two postoperative days. Secondary outcomes were maximum pain scores, opioid adverse effects, and knee functional scores (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm) 3, 6, and 9 months after surgery.

Results: Compared with FTB, FTB+iPACK resulted in similar OME consumption (median (IQR)=50 (14-103) vs 60 (32-89) mg, respectively; median of the difference (95% CI): 5 (-14, 28) mg, p=0.49). No significant intergroup differences were found in terms of pain scores, opioid-related side effects, or functional knee recovery. Pain and symptoms subscales of KOOS and IKDC at 9 months were higher for patients with an OME consumption <50 mg within the first two postoperative days, but these statistical differences did not reach the minimal clinically important difference.

Conclusions: iPACK block has no additional analgesic benefits for primary ACLR…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 45 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free