Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Wound Catheter Infusion with Ropivacaine After Abdominal Surgery in Children Aged < 1 Year: A Randomized Controlled Trial

L. Staals, Jaap Dogger, C. Keyzer-Dekker, A. Boerlage, Eric F. Bokhorst, J. V. van Wijk, J. Scheepe, M. van Dijk et al.

Pediatric Drugs, 2025

30 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Wound catheter infusion (WCI) with local anesthetics provides effective postoperative analgesia in adults, without adverse effects on wound healing. Studies on WCI in infants are scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of WCI with ropivacaine as treatment for postoperative pain in infants. We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial including children aged < 1 year undergoing open abdominal surgery. Informed consent was obtained. All children received a wound catheter at the end of surgery and were randomized for treatment with either ropivacaine (bolus dose of 2 mg/kg and continuous infusion of 0.2 mg/kg/h) (R-group) or placebo (C-group), for 72 h postoperatively. The C-group received morphine 100 mcg/kg intravenously at the end of surgery, the R-group received placebo. Standard analgesia postoperatively was paracetamol intravenously and rescue morphine intravenously. Primary outcome was the cumulative amount of morphine (mcg/kg) administered in the first 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the number of patients needing morphine, area under the curve over 24 hours of COMFORT-B and Numeric Rating Scale pain scores, incidence of adverse events, and plasma concentrations of ropivacaine. After inclusion of 30 patients, the study was discontinued because of slow recruitment. In two cases, the wound catheter was accidentally displaced directly after surgery, therefore data of 28 children were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 30 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free