Evidence Hub

RF 46-790 versus paracetamol: effect on post-operative pain

Haanaes HR, Benterud UJ, Skoglund LA

International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology, 1986

Abstract

The analgetic efficacy of a new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug fluproquazone (RF 46-790, Sandoz A. G., Switzerland) was tested versus paracetamol in a double-blind parallel group study using pain after surgical removal of impacted third molars. The patients received 3 doses of 100 mg fluproquazone or 500 mg paracetamol. Statistical analysis was made for the first and last dose. No statistically significant difference was found between the two treatment groups with respect to the first and last dose taken. Only minor complaints of side effects were noted with no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The study indicates equianalgesia of 100 mg fluproquazone and 500 mg paracetamol which is supported by studies with other pain models. The analgetic properties of fluproquazone are reviewed.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free