Evidence Hub

Characterization of treatment intensified (add-on to metformin) adults with type 2 diabetes in Thailand: A cross-sectional real-world study (CONVERGE)

Chutintorn Sriphrapradang, A. Thakkinstian, Ratiporn Chinthammit, Gurudutt Nayak

Journal of Diabetes Investigation, 2025

1,000 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The CONVERGE (Cardiovascular Outcomes and Value in the Real-World with GLP-1RAs) study characterized demographics, clinical characteristics, and medication use in treatment-intensified (add-on to metformin) adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Thailand.

METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study of data from medical records (Jul 26, 2013, to Dec 31, 2017) was descriptively summarized for overall population and subgroups defined by glucose-lowering agent (GLA) classes.

RESULTS: Data from 1,000 adults were collected in reverse chronological order. At baseline, the mean (SD) age was 60 (12) years, HbA1c was 8.0%, and the median (IQR) T2D duration was 1.0 (0.2-2.4) years. Patients taking SGLT2-is (sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors) had a longer T2D duration (1.8 years, 0.8-3.2), GLP-1RAs (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists) had a higher body mass index of 32.0 (8.84) kg/m2, and insulin subgroup had a higher HbA1c 8.5% (7.5-10.1). The utilization of GLP-1 RAs/SGLT-2is was low (1.5% and 6%, respectively). Among the subgroups, most patients in the GLP-1RA (80.0%) and insulin subgroup (81.3%) receiving 3/≥4 GLAs. The most frequently prescribed GLAs post-metformin were sulfonylureas (45.2%) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (39.4%). Overall, 90% received ≥1 cardiovascular (CV) medication; lipid-lowering agents (78%) were the most prescribed.

CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate low utilization of GLAs with CV benefits, attributed to a lack of CV…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free