Evidence Hub

Evaluating the Use of High-Intensity Non-Focused Ultrasound Treatment to Improve Skin Laxity and Facial Wrinkles in Asian Patients

Chung MMH, Wong CSM, Chan MWM, Shek SYN, Yeung CK, Chan HHL

Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2026

42 participants

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of high-intensity, non-focused, parallel ultrasound treatments to lift lax tissue in the submental and neck zones, lift the eyebrow, and improve facial wrinkles in an Asian population.

Methods: This prospective, open-label, non-randomized single-center, self-controlled clinical study recruited 42 participants aged 35 to 67. Participants received a single treatment, covering the full face, neck, and submental zones. Standardized images were taken, and assessments were performed using the Physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (PGAIS) and Fitzpatrick Classification of Wrinkling and Degree of Elastosis. 3D images were taken to calculate the volume change after treatment.

Results: Among the 42 patients, 83.3% showed improvement in submental and neck skin laxity at the 3-month follow-up. Improvements were also observed in eyebrow elevation (28.6%) and facial wrinkles (38.1%) at 3 months. The Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Scale showed improvement in 26.2% of patients at 3 months, with sustained effects up to 9 months in 12.8% of patients. A trend of volumetric reduction of 1.04 ± 3.49 ml (p = 0.06) was demonstrated in the jawline and submental area. Transient edema and erythema were noted in 7.2% and 50% of patents initially but resolved on subsequent follow-up visits, and no other adverse events were documented.

Conclusions: High-intensity, non-focused, parallel ultrasound is effective in improving skin…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 42 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free