Evidence Hub

Evaluation of Oral Acetaminophen on Tear Production and Intraocular Pressure in Healthy Dogs

Mesa AM, Mayordomo-Febrer A, López-Murcia MM, Cerrada I, Ortillés Á

Veterinary ophthalmology, 2026

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effects of a therapeutic dose of oral acetaminophen on Schirmer tear test I (STT-1) and intraocular pressure (IOP) in healthy dogs.

Animals studied: Fourteen healthy adult beagle dogs.

Procedures: All animals underwent a physical and ophthalmic examination, hematology, and plasma biochemistry prior to treatment. Oral acetaminophen at 30 mg/kg every 12 h for 5 days was administered. STT-1 and IOP were measured in both eyes before drug administration. Ocular adverse effects were assessed using a semiquantitative preclinical ocular toxicology scoring system. All measurements were performed by the same investigator under controlled environmental conditions. At the end time point, follow-up physical and ophthalmic examinations and blood workup were conducted.

Results: STT-1 remained stable throughout the study, with no significant differences between time points (p = 0.665) or overall trend over time (p = 0.356). IOP showed no consistent temporal trend (p = 0.602), although significant differences were observed between specific time points (p = 0.003). IOP at 24 h was higher than at 12 h (p = 0.031) and 60 h (p = 0.009), and at 0 h compared to 60 h (p = 0.043); however, these differences were transient and clinically irrelevant (1-2 mmHg). Mild conjunctival hyperaemia and fluorescein staining uptake were observed in 3/28 eyes, although these were mild and resolved spontaneously without treatment. No systemic adverse effects were detected.

Conclusions:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free