Evidence Hub

Comparison of cumulative opioid consumption between variable-rate feedback infusion and fixed-rate basal infusion modes of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia following mixed surgery: protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial

Xing Y, Liu M, Sun Y, Mao X, Li J, Zhang Z, Sun H, Luo F

BMJ open, 2026

1,170 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Inadequately managed postoperative pain remains a significant clinical challenge, often leading to delayed mobilisation and increased complications. While intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is a mainstay of treatment, conventional fixed-rate basal infusion modes may not align with the fluctuating biphasic nature of postoperative pain. This often results in either insufficient analgesia or unnecessary opioid overexposure. Advanced network-integrated PCA pumps now allow for 'variable-rate feedback infusion,' which dynamically adjusts the background rate based on real-time patient demand. This study aims to determine whether a variable-rate feedback infusion mode reduces total cumulative opioid consumption at 48 hours postoperatively while providing non-inferior analgesic efficacy compared with a fixed-rate basal infusion mode.

Methods and analysis: This is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial to be conducted at three hospitals in China. A total of 1170 patients (aged 18-65 years, American Society of Anaesthesiologists I-III) undergoing elective mixed surgery under general anaesthesia, including thoracic, abdominal, spinal, orthopaedic and cranial procedures performed using either minimally invasive or open approaches, will be recruited and randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either the fixed-rate basal infusion group or the variable-rate feedback infusion group. Both groups will receive a standardised PCA solution of sufentanil. In the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 1,170 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free