Evidence Hub

Physiotherapist-led education and exercise for patients with MRI-verified hip abductor tendon pathology: a prospective cohort study

Høgsholt M, Kierkegaard-Brøchner S, Lange J, Lund B, Langgård Jørgensen S, Thorborg K, Bagger Bohn M

BMJ open, 2026

55 participants

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate changes in lateral hip pain following a 3-month, physiotherapist-led, education and exercise programme in patients with clinically and MRI-verified hip abductor tendon pathology.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Secondary care, Danish public teaching hospital.

Participants: From May 2024 to July 2025, 60 patients (100% women) with lateral hip pain duration of >6 months, aged 18-75 years (mean age 58.2), MRI-verified hip abductor tendon pathology were included; 55 patients completed the intervention.

Interventions: Patient education on load management and modification of daily activity was provided through seven physiotherapist-led sessions over 3 months. Additionally, patients followed an individually progressed daily home-based exercise programme.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome was change in the subscale pain of the revised Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS). Secondary outcomes included hip-related patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life, isometric hip muscle strength and a 30-second Chair Stand Test (30s-CST).

Results: Adherence to the exercise protocol was 85%. The mean (95% CI) score in the revised HAGOS pain improved from 46.4 (41.5 to 51.2) to 60.1 (54.4 to 65.7) at 3 months follow-up. Clinically relevant improvements were observed in secondary hip-related patient-reported outcomes, alongside improvements in generic patient-reported outcomes. Minor strength improvements…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 55 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free