Evidence Hub

Comparison of local anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia (PSP/IPP) on QoR-15 in patients undergoing subpectoral implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs)-a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled pragmatic trial with two arms

Wallner B, Stundner O, Gasteiger E, Mittermayr M, Fiala A, Hollmann MW, Gasser S, Stastny L et al.

Trials, 2025

80 participants

Abstract

Background: The implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) is the treatment of choice for the prevention of sudden cardiac deaths in high-risk patients. Given the comorbidities, this superficial surgical intervention is mostly performed in local anaesthesia. Triggered by the upcoming opioid crisis, the burden of postsurgical pain has gained popularity, as adequate perioperative pain management is a cornerstone in the prevention of persistent opioid use. Aim of this study is to assess the perioperative pain management of local anaesthesia versus pectoserratus plain/interpectoral plain (PSP/IPP) block for submuscular CIED implantation.

Methods: In a single-centre, prospective, single-blinded, two-group randomized trial, 80 patients undergoing submuscular CIED implantation will be randomized to receive a PSP/IPP with ropivacaine 0.375% (intervention group) or a LA with lidocaine 2% (control group). The primary outcome is the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) assessed 24 h after surgery. Secondary endpoints include the intraoperative additional LA administration; the postoperative analgesic consumption; the need and dose of additional analgesia; Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) after 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h; and VAS-AUC and VAS groups 60 mm.

Discussion: This prospective, randomized, controlled, and single-blinded trial aims to assess if a PSP/IPP with ropivacaine affects the postoperative QoR-15 score compared to a conventional local anaesthesia with lidocaine in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 80 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free