Evidence Hub

A randomized controlled trial of N-acetylcysteine in the treatment of early-onset preeclampsia: Study Protocol

Okunade KS, Adejimi AA, Adenekan MA, Ademuyiwa IY, Adelabu H, Habeebu-Adeyemi FM, Soibi-Harry AP, Onasanya O et al.

PloS one, 2026

153 participants

Abstract

Background: Despite significant advancements in obstetric care, the incidence of preeclampsia remains a substantial public health challenge, and effective strategies to prevent the disease progression remain limited, particularly in low-resource settings. N-acetylcysteine (NAC), an antioxidant and glutathione precursor, has demonstrated anti-inflammatory and vasodilatory effects, making it a promising candidate for repurposing. However, robust evidence from well-powered randomized controlled trials is lacking.

Objective: This study will evaluate the impact of NAC on the time-to-disease progression in pregnant women with early-onset preeclampsia in Lagos, Nigeria.

Methods: This is the study protocol for a proof-of-concept, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial to be conducted between April 2026 to July 2028 at the maternity units of the two teaching hospitals in Lagos, Nigeria. At baseline, n = 153 sexually active women aged 18 years or older diagnosed with early-onset preeclampsia at 24-34 weeks' gestation will be randomised to receive either daily oral tablet containing 600 mg of NAC or a placebo tablet that is matched for appearance and the dosing regimen in addition to standard antenatal care from diagnosis (randomisation) until either 34 weeks' gestation or delivery, whichever comes first. The primary endpoint is the time-to-progression (in days) of early-onset preeclampsia to severe disease. The data analysis will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 153 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free