Evidence Hub

IMpact of PerioperAtive KeTamine on Enhanced Recovery After abdominal Surgery (IMPAKT ERAS): a pragmatic randomised single-cluster trial

Raymond BL, Allen BFS, Freundlich RE, McEvoy MD, Parrish CG, Ruble SR, Scharfman KH, Wanderer JP et al.

British journal of anaesthesia, 2025

1,522 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

Background: Despite widespread adoption of ketamine into enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, research regarding its specific impact on perioperative outcomes is limited. This pragmatic, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-cluster trial evaluated the impact of ketamine on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery within an established ERAS protocol.

Methods: Male and female patients, aged ≥18 yr, were randomised to ketamine or saline placebo bolus at induction of general anaesthesia, followed by an intraoperative and postoperative infusion for 48 h. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay. Secondary outcomes included total opioid consumption and the incidences of side-effects and adverse events.

Results: A total of 1522 patients were included. In covariate adjusted analyses, ketamine administration did not decrease length of stay (odds ratio [OR] 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.47) or opioid consumption (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.71-1.01) compared with placebo. Patients receiving ketamine experienced higher odds of ICU transfer (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.14-3.63) and lower odds of meeting early discharge milestones (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.50-0.93). Rapid response activation (OR 1.51; 95% CI 0.85-2.68) and ileus requiring nasogastric decompression (OR 1.26; 95% CI 0.87-1.84) were similar between groups. Patients receiving ketamine experienced higher rates of debilitating dizziness (OR 6.05; 95% CI 3.02-12.11),…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 1,522 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free