Evidence Hub

Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of pentavalent meningococcal MenABCWY vaccine in healthy infants: A phase 2b randomized clinical trial

Martinon-Torres F, Lamberth E, Natalini Martinez S, Salamanca de la Cueva I, Zolotas L, Oladipupo I, Maguire JD, Trammel J et al.

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025

314 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Invasive meningococcal disease is an uncommon but serious disease predominantly affecting children. This phase 2b study evaluated MenABCWY in 6-month-old infants followed by MenB-fHbp and MenABCWY in 2-month-old infants, the latter being the target age and intervention. Participants were randomized to MenABCWY, 60 µg or 120 µg MenB-fHbp+MenACWY-TT, or 4CMenB+MenACWY-TT, administered as 2 primary and 1 booster dose. The primary safety objective was to describe the safety profile of MenABCWY in participants enrolled at 2 months. Primary immunogenicity objectives were the percentage of participants achieving seroprotective serum bactericidal antibody using human complement titers. Overall, 314 and 12 participants were randomized to sentinel cohort and open-label expanded-enrollment stages, respectively. Based on 2 reports of fever requiring invasive investigations and accompanied by cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis and 1 report arising from a previous study, the Sponsor terminated the study. Local reactions and systemic events after primary vaccination were generally mild to moderate, and tended to be higher with MenABCWY versus 4CMenB+MenACWY-TT. Immunogenicity data suggest that 1 month after vaccination 2, MenABCWY responses for MenA/C/W/Y were robust and comparable with 4CMenB+MenACWY-TT in 2-month-old participants. Immune responses for MenB test strains were higher with MenABCWY versus 4CMenB+MenACWY-TT and generally similar with 60 µg and 120 µg MenB-fHbp+MenACWY-TT or…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 314 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free