Evidence Hub

Protocol for a study comparing the efficacy of hysterectomy in patients with enlarged uterus via TU-LESS and vNOTES: a single-blind, prospective randomised clinical trial

Chen X, Zhang M, Gao M, Wu Y, He Y, Liu J, Cui H, Jin H

BMJ open, 2025

210 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Minimally invasive techniques have been widely adopted for hysterectomy, including Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery (TU-LESS) and Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES). However, their efficacy in patients with an enlarged uterus (≥280 g) remains not fully illustrated due to surgical complexity. We will compare the perioperative outcomes and recovery profiles of TU-LESS and vNOTES of this population in this study.

Methods and analysis: This single-blinded, two-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial will take place in West China Second University Hospital. A total of 210 women with benign or precancerous uterine enlargement undergoing total hysterectomy (±salpingectomy/adnexectomy) will be randomised (1:1) to TU-LESS or vNOTES. The trial will span 2 years, including a follow-up of half a year. The primary outcomes will be the proportions achieving the indices of enhanced recovery after surgery respectively, including liquid diet tolerance, flatus passage, unassisted urination and mobility, during 24 hours after surgery and discharge within 2 days. Secondary outcomes include pain scores, operative duration, blood loss, complications, scar quality, analgesic use and pelvic/sexual function. Data collection occurs at baseline, perioperatively and 3/6 months postoperatively.

Ethics and dissemination: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Second University Hospital (2023 medical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 210 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free