Evidence Hub

Pericapsular nerve group with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block vs. suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for analgesia in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective comparative study

Celebioglu G, Debbag S, Akca B, Saricaoglu F

BMC anesthesiology, 2026

48 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To comparepostoperative analgesia, opioid consumption, and early motor function between suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SFIB) and pericapsular nerve group block combined with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (PENG+LFCN) in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) under general anesthesia. METHODS: In this single-center, prospective, non-randomized study, 48 adults undergoing posterolateral THA received either SFIB (0.25% bupivacaine 40 mL) or PENG+LFCN (0.5% bupivacaine 15 mL + 5 mL). Primary outcomes were pain scores measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and during movement at 3, 12, 24, and 48 h. Secondary outcomes included morphine use via patient controlled analgesia, quadriceps strength and physiotherapy participation. Exploratory analyses summarised total pain burden using area under the curve (AUC, 3–48 h) and time-weighted average pain (TWAP), with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) used as a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Rest VAS at 24 h was lower with SFIB (1.25) vs. PENG+LFCN (2.46): mean difference 1.21 (95% CI 0.31–2.10), p = 0.017. Morphine use at 12–24 h was lower with PENG+LFCN (0.75 vs. 1.88 mg): −1.13 mg (95% CI − 2.07 to − 0.18), p = 0.027; total 0–48 h consumption was similar (p = 0.114). Quadriceps weakness at 6 h was less frequent with PENG+LFCN (29.2% vs. 54.2%; OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.11–1.15), but this difference was not statistically significant; all patients recovered full strength by 24 h.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 48 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free