Evidence Hub

Effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction in patients with gynecological abdominal or pelvic tumors: a study protocol for a prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial

Liu M, Fan K, Cao Y, Qian L, Zhang Y, Wu D, Wang Y, Dai C et al.

Annals of medicine, 2026

210 participants

Abstract

Background: Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD) commonly presents with nausea, vomiting, abdominal distension, delayed flatus or stool, and prolonged intolerance to oral intake. It can cause postoperative pain, delayed gastrointestinal motility, or intestinal obstruction requiring secondary surgery, imposing substantial physical, emotional, and economic burdens. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), a non-invasive brain-gut axis modulator, may promote postoperative gastrointestinal recovery. This study will assess the efficacy and safety of taVNS in reducing the incidence of POGD after gynecological abdominal or pelvic tumor surgery.

Methods and analysis: This randomized, single-center, controlled trial will enroll 210 patients scheduled for gynecological abdominal or pelvic tumor surgery and randomly assign them 1:1 to taVNS or sham-taVNS (n = 105 each). The primary outcome is the incidence of POGD within three days after surgery, assessed by the Intake, Feeling nauseated, Emesis, Exam, and Duration of symptoms (I-FEED) scoring system. Secondary outcomes include time to first flatus, time to first bowel movement, incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to first ambulation, time to first oral intake, incidence of postoperative delirium, and postoperative pain intensity.

Ethics and dissemination: The Ethics Committee of Huzhou Central Hospital approved this study (approval no. 202503014-03). Findings will be…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 210 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free