Evidence Hub

Evaluation of safety and efficacy of the combination of mebeverine and sulpiride in treatment of patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders: A prospective cohort

El-Kassas M, Tawheed A, El Halwagy H, Ezzat R, El Fouly A, Elfert A

The Journal of international medical research, 2026

253 participants

Abstract

ObjectiveIn this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a combination of 100 mg mebeverine and 25 mg sulpiride (Colona®) in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders.MethodsThis multicenter, cohort study was conducted in Egypt, comprising 253 patients diagnosed with functional gastrointestinal disorders. The treatment duration was 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percentage of relative change in the tailored gastrointestinal symptoms rating scale.ResultsThe baseline tailored gastrointestinal symptoms rating scale mean (±SD) score was 11.42 ± 4.10. However, after 2 weeks (±1 week) of combination therapy, the score significantly decreased to 3.11 ± 2.48 (p < 0.01), demonstrating a mean (±SD) improvement of 71.84% ±20.56%. Among 253 patients, 227 patients (89.72%, 95% confidence interval: 85.96%-93.49%) demonstrated ≥50% improvement in the tailored gastrointestinal symptoms rating scale total score, whereas 26 (10.28%) did not report any improvement. In terms of safety, 2 (0.79%) patients reported diarrhea, 1 (0.4%) had mild dyspepsia, and 1 (0.4%) had galactorrhea.ConclusionOur results suggest that the combination of mebeverine and sulpiride may represent a safe and effective treatment option for patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 253 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free