Evidence Hub

Socioeconomic disparity in stage at cancer diagnosis among patients with type 2 diabetes in Dutch primary care: a cross-sectional study

De-Haan-Du Jing, K. Groenier, Nanne Kleefstra, B. van der Vegt, Sabine Siesling, G. Landman, G. D. de Bock

BMJ public health, 2024

71 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Disparities in cancer stage appear to exist by socioeconomic status (SES) in the Netherlands. We evaluated the association of SES and cancer stage among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) treated in primary care. Research design and methods This cross-sectional study linked data from the primary care Zwolle Outpatient Diabetes Project Integrating Available Care database for T2DM (n=71 648, 1998–2019) to a cancer registry and personal records database in the Netherlands. Only cancers (excluding all skin cancers) diagnosed after the onset of diabetes were included and grouped by stages (III–IV or 0–II). SES was estimated as low, intermediate or high based on postal codes and Dutch social research status scores. Logistic regression was performed, with stratification by sex and correction for age, body mass index, smoking, diabetes duration, glycaemic control and metformin use. ORs and 95% CI are reported. Results Of the 5087 males and 4021 females with any cancer, 50.1% and 53.7% had low SES, respectively. Compared with patients with high SES, the ORs for diagnosing cancer at stages III–IV in patients with low SES were 1.00 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.19) for males and 1.32 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.67) for females. However, the ORs varied by cancer type: breast, 1.46 (95% CI 0.90 to 2.39); male colorectal, 1.00 (95% CI 0.70 to 1.43); female colorectal, 1.72 (95% CI 1.06 to 2.77); prostate, 0.81 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.15); male lung, 1.06 (95% CI 0.62 to 1.80) and female lung,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 71 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free