Evidence Hub

Noninsulin antidiabetic prescription patterns in Colombia: a cross-sectional study

J. Machado-Alba, A. Gaviria-Mendoza, M. Machado-Duque, L. Valladales-Restrepo, Andrés Alvarado-Segovia

Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2024

155,381 participants

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) continues to increase; the clinical practice guidelines continue to modify the recommendations for its treatment. Objective: The aim was to determine the prescription patterns of noninsulin antidiabetics in a group of patients from Colombia. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: The use of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs based on a population database of patients under treatment in 2022. Comorbidities were identified, including total numbers, proportions, and defined daily doses of each antidiabetic agent per 1000 inhabitants/day (DHD). Results: A total of 155,381 patients with T2DM were identified, with a mean age of 67.1 ± 12.0 years. The most widely used antidiabetics according to DHD were metformin (9.46 DHD), empagliflozin (5.3), sitagliptin (2.8), linagliptin (2.4), and dapagliflozin (2.3), mainly in combination therapy (55.5%), most often two (31.2% of patients) or three antidiabetics (22.4% of patients). The most frequent cardiovascular comorbidities were hypertension (67.6%), chronic kidney disease (6.3%), and coronary ischemic heart disease (2.5%), treated with angiotensin 2 receptor antagonists, followed by diuretics, calcium antagonists, and β-blockers. Conclusion: This group of patients with T2DM has been treated mainly with metformin alone or in combination with other antidiabetic drugs, but despite the changes in treatment in recent years, a significant number of patients with concomitant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 155,381 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free