Evidence Hub

The extrapyramidal syndromes of chronic kidney disease and dialysis (EPS-CKDD): diagnostic criteria, risk factors and prognosis

Manickavasagar R, Chemmanam T, Youssef A, Agarwal A, Prentice DA, Irish AB

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians, 2022

20 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute extrapyramidal movement disorders in dialysis patients are rare, inconsistently defined and have uncertain aetiology and prognosis.

AIM: Define diagnostic criteria, prognosis and risk factors.

DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective case series review of 20 patients (14 female, mean age 62 years) receiving dialysis for a median of 15 (interquartile range 4-35) months who presented with acute parkinsonism (AP = 11) or chorea/athetosis (CA = 9).

RESULTS: All patients had type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 6.8 ± 1.0) and had received metformin. Lactic acidosis was present in 2 patients at presentation and serum lactate was elevated in 7/15 patients tested. No patient had abnormal copper or thyroid metabolism and 5/8 patients tested returned marginal abnormalities in heavy metal screening. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed characteristic bilateral symmetric T2 hyperintensity of the basal ganglia (BG), predominantly putamen and globus pallidus (the lentiform nucleus) and more extensive involvement of the external and internal capsules in patients with AP presentation. Post-mortem demonstrated cytotoxic necrosis of the BG. Therapy included thiamine, intensive dialysis and cessation of metformin. Two patients died acutely, nine recovered and nine had residual symptoms. Median survival did not differ by presentation: AP 24 [95% confidence interval (CI) 21-27] and CA 33 (95% CI 32-35) months, P = 0.21.

CONCLUSIONS: There are two distinct clinical extrapyramidal movement…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free