Evidence Hub

Progressive loss of glycemic control during chronic DPP-4 inhibitor therapy despite preserved β-cell function: a case report suggesting acquired incretin resistance

Prasad S, Ahuja A, Sharma S, Nagda J, Agrawal S, Parmar V, Vardhan H

Cardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are widely prescribed second-line agents for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Secondary treatment failure with DPP-4 inhibitors is conventionally attributed to progressive β-cell dysfunction. Acquired resistance to DPP-4 inhibitor therapy, characterised by progressive glycemic deterioration despite preserved endogenous insulin secretion, remains an under-recognised and poorly documented clinical phenomenon. We report a case of secondary DPP-4 inhibitor failure with preserved β-cell function, raising the hypothesis of acquired incretin resistance as an alternative mechanism of treatment failure. CASE PRESENTATION: A 52-year-old non-obese man (body mass index 24.9 kg/m²) with a 4-year history of T2DM developed progressive glycemic deterioration after 22 months of stable glycemic control with metformin and sitagliptin combination therapy. His glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) increased from 6.7% to 8.4% over an 8-month period, with corresponding elevations in fasting plasma glucose (168 mg/dL) and postprandial glucose (248 mg/dL). Comprehensive evaluation revealed preserved β-cell function with normal fasting insulin (14 µIU/mL), C-peptide (2.1 ng/mL), and homeostatic model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β) of 68%. Insulin resistance was mild (HOMA-IR 2.3). Autoimmune markers were negative, hepatic and renal function were normal (AST 28 U/L, ALT 32 U/L, eGFR 92 mL/min/1.73 m²), and secondary causes of hyperglycemia were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free