Evidence Hub

Candidate treatments for long COVID: a narrative review of expert and patient-driven priorities

Baptista SN, Atkins T, Chakraborty S, Bakhit M, Glasziou P, Byambasuren O

Frontiers in medicine, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Objective: To map the existing evidence for candidate treatments for long COVID that were prioritised by clinicians and people with lived experience, and to characterise their feasibility, acceptability and safety.

Study design: The study was conducted as a narrative review using pragmatic methods including iterative stakeholder-informed decision-making a monthly-updated evidence search, rapid lay evidence summaries and a structured research prioritisation process.

Data sources: Potential candidate treatments were identified via a combination of database and trial registry searches. These were then ranked by clinicians and people with lived experience using surveys. Evidence summaries for the top 14 interventions (low-dose naltrexone, antivirals, metformin, nicotine, vagus nerve stimulation, antihistamines, guanfacine, colchicine, nattokinase, intravenous immunoglobulins, monoclonal antibodies, coenzyme Q10, multicomponent rehabilitation packages, and exercise training) were created. Prioritised treatments were collated first by searching a collaborative living evidence database (updated monthly) of relevant systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials and then by conducting supplementary searches of other study designs.

Data synthesis: Six of 14 interventions had long-COVID-specific randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence (exercise [16 RCTs], multicomponent packages [5 RCTs], coenzyme Q10 [2 RCTs], antivirals [1 RCT], vagus nerve stimulation [1 pilot RCT],…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free