Evidence Hub

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system treatment for endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer: a systematic review

Bolling KR, Suh-Burgmann E, Reed SD, Westin S, Fassett M, Wahdan Y, Lukkari-Lax E, Schoendorf J et al.

Therapeutic advances in reproductive health, 2026

342 participants

Abstract

Background: Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems (LNG-IUS) are considered off-label and investigational in the United States for treating non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia (NAEH), atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH), and early-stage endometrial cancer (EC), though evidence suggests potential benefit.

Objectives: To summarize the available evidence regarding the use of LNG-IUS, with or without other therapies, for the treatment of NAEH, AEH, and early-stage (FIGO I/IA) EC.

Design: Systematic literature review and meta-analyses.

Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) were searched from database inception through May 2022.

Methods: Data from studies reporting complete outcome definitions and study populations that were aligned with the 2014 World Health Organization (WHO) endometrial hyperplasia classification criteria or were defined as FIGO grade 1 stage I/IA EC were extracted and assessed in random-effects meta-analyses. A risk of bias assessment was completed using recommended study-design-specific tools.

Results: 1085 unique records were reviewed; 80 publications were included, with data from 30 assessed in meta-analyses: NAEH, n = 14; AEH, n = 21; EC, n = 5. Complete response (CR) rates at 12 months were high: 86.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 78.50%-91.55%; n = 342) of patients with NAEH, 83.9% (95% CI: 71.95%-91.34%; n = 196) of patients with AEH, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 342 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free