Evidence Hub

EP816 - ECE_2033 - The clinical value of routine C-peptide measurement in diabetes diagnosis and management: a two-case series

Teona Kandinashvili

European Journal of Endocrinology, 2026

Abstract

Case 1

Accurate classification of diabetes type at diagnosis is crucial for appropriate management. Clinical presentation alone may be misleading, particularly in young patients with weight loss and ketosis. C-peptide measurement can provide valuable information regarding endogenous insulin secretion and guide therapeutic decisions.

A 33-year-old man with no prior chronic illnesses presented with unintentional weight loss of 10 kg over two weeks, polydipsia, and polyuria. His body mass index was 19.5 kg/m2. Laboratory evaluation revealed fasting plasma glucose of 309 mg/dL, HbA1c of 11.6%, and urinary ketones of 5 mmol/L. Given the clinical picture suggestive of type 1 diabetes, further evaluation was performed to determine diabetes type.

Fasting C-peptide level was 2.49 ng/mL (reference range 0.73-4.37), indicating preserved endogenous insulin secretion. Based on this finding, insulin therapy was deferred, and treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents (DPP-4 inhibitor combined with metformin), along with dietary modification and increased physical activity, was initiated.

At a 2-week follow-up visit, the patient demonstrated significant improvement in glycemic control, with fasting glucose ranging from 90-125 mg/dL and 2-hour postprandial glucose between 145-185 mg/dL. Weight loss had stabilized, and the patient reported complete resolution of symptoms.

This case highlights the importance of C-peptide measurement in the initial evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free