Evidence Hub

P0600LONG-term prognosis of patients with metformin -associated lactic acidosis(mala) and acute kidney failure

Maria Rosa Melero Martin, Alejandra Muñoz de Morales, Alberto Tejedor Jorge, Rodriguez benitez Patrocinio, A. Bascuñana, A. Gueorguieva, M. Goicoechea

2020

109 participants

Abstract

Although metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) is a very rare event, is frequently seen in patients on metformin with risk factors for developing acute kidney injury (AKI). The long-term prognosis in patients with metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) and renal failure remains unknown.

To describe the characteristics and prognosis of AKI in patients with MALA and investigate whether prescription of RRT and previous renal function are associated with long-term outcomes.

A retrospective single-centre case series. One hundred and nine patients affected with MALA and AKI admitted between Marx 2007 and February 2019 were included. We analysed comorbidities, laboratory tests, clinical parameters and prescription pattern of RRT at admission. After discharging, renal outcomes (doubling serum creatinine or starting dialysis) and mortality were assessed in the long-term.

We included 109 patients (59 males and 50 females), mean age of 74.2±8.6 years and mean Charlson comorbidity index of 8.0±2.4. 54 out of 109 patients had previous chronic kidney disease (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.72 m2). Precipitating causes of AKI associated MALA included; acute dehydration (84.4%), exposure to iodinated contrast (7.3%) and non-specified causes (8.3%). During the admission, renal replacement therapy (RRT) was performed in 72 patients (continuous renal replacement therapy in 47 and dialysis in 25). RRT requirements was significantly associated with lactate, acidosis and serum creatinine levels,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 109 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free