Evidence Hub

Energy expenditure in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lauren Hanna, K. Nguo, Teresa Brown, Judith D Bauer

Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025

439 participants

Abstract

Accurate estimation of energy needs is essential for effective nutrition interventions to improve outcomes in head and neck cancer (HNC). However, predictive equations used to estimate energy requirements may be inaccurate in cancer populations. To inform effective intervention delivery, this systematic review synthesised evidence regarding resting or total energy expenditure (REE or TEE) measured using reference methods (indirect calorimetry or doubly labelled water) in adults with any stage of HNC. Four databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL plus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched, and eligible studies included comparisons of energy expenditure to non-cancer controls, predictive equations, wearable devices, or repeated measurements before and after treatment. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Eleven studies (n = 439) were included. All measured REE using indirect calorimetry; none assessed TEE or wearable devices. One study compared REE to non-cancer controls (n = 40 per group) and found no significant difference. Pooled pre-treatment REE was 1502 kcal/day (10 studies, n = 431). Measured REE was higher than predicted (mean difference 110 kcal/day, p = 0.001, eight studies, n = 333, low certainty) and decreased following treatment (mean difference –140 kcal/day, p < 0.001, five studies, n = 176, low certainty); differences were < 10% of overall REE and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 439 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free